投稿Journal of materials chemistry A 意见是Reject and Resubmission 是什么意思?编辑意见是：Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Please find the reviewers’ reports on your manuscript copied below. The reviewers feel that the paper is unsuitable for publication in its present form, and that substantial revisions are necessary before the paper could be reconsidered for publication. We therefore feel unable to proceed with publication at this stage. However, we would like to encourage you to fully address the concerns of the reviewers and resubmit an appropriately revised manuscript to Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to further peer review before a decision is reached. 审稿人意见是：Referee: 1 Comments to the Author The work reported an interesting solution method for the synthesis of N-doped carbon coated Li4Ti5O2 hollow nanospheres. The resultant material exhibits excellent rate capability with high capacities for lithium storage. My overall response to this work is positive. Provided the authors address the points below, it can be accepted for publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 1. The mechanism involved in the formation of Li4Ti5O2 hollow nanospheres needs to be explained. TEM characterization may give some clues on this process. 2. How the element content shown in Table S1 is obtained? 3. The signal of N element in XPS spectra is too weak to evidence its presence. The element mapping may be helpful to make it visualized. 4. It is worth noting that the resistance of the cell composed of Li4Ti5O2 electrode is greatly reduced after deep cycling regardless the carbon coating. The phenomenon is interesting but unusual. Can the authors explain this? Referee: 2 Comments to the Author This work reported the synthesis of hollow microspheres composed of N-doped carbon coated Li4Ti5O12 nanosheets. The rate performance of NC-LTO seems being improved significantly compared with the undoped samples. Novelty is not enough: (1) N-doped carbon coating is a common method to improve the rate performance of LTO (TiO2) (i.e. ref. 30, 31 in this manuscript, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 8092); (2) The hollow microspheres assembled by nanosheets are also reported in many papers (i.e. Electrochimica Acta 2009, 54, 6244; Electrochimica Acta 2010, 55, 6596; J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 16220). 1. What role does the nitrogen doping paly in improving the rate performance of LTO? The author should explain it in detail. 2. Since the nitrogen content tested through the XPS was not accurate, the authors are advised to further confirm the content of the nitrogen in the NC-LTO samples. The authors are also advised to further improve their XPS analysis with results for pure LTO in the manuscript. 3. Properties of the obtained material are very good related to rate capability. Nevertheless, since thickness and active masse of the electrodes can influence these data, the authors should specify and be sure data are comparable for all samples. 不知道修改以后重投此杂志会不会有希望，希望帮帮忙啊，各位朋友。查看更多7个回答 . 25人已关注
第1天
关注盖德视界
添加小助手
