Angew 申诉两周了还没消息?你的文章几个审稿人?这样一般不会拒 就两个审稿人,第一个审稿人虽然意见里没直接写拒稿,但是填了建议其他杂志,这应该是编辑拒稿的原因吧 1. Please rate the importance of the reported results Reviewer #1: Important Reviewer #2: Highly important (top 20%) -------------------- 2. Please indicate whether the results discussed justify publication as a Research Article Reviewer #1: Publish in another format Reviewer #2: Publish as a Communication -------------------- 3. Please rate the citation of previous publications Reviewer #1: Insufficient Reviewer #2: Insufficient -------------------- 4. Please rate the length of the manuscript Reviewer #1: Concise Reviewer #2: Concise -------------------- 5. Please rate the verification of hypotheses and conclusions by the presented data Reviewer #1: Major inconsistencies Reviewer #2: Fully consistent -------------------- 6. Please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate Reviewer #1: ChemSusChem Reviewer #2: (No Response) -------------------- 7. Please indicate whether you have included attachments Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No -------------------- 8. Please rate the quality of the Supporting Information Reviewer #1: Satisfactory Reviewer #2: Satisfactory查看更多