有关EDX问题求助？恳求各位大佬帮我看一下审稿人的意思。 "- For SEM/EDX accuracy and sum of mass% is missing. If the latter is more than a few at.% away from 100 the measurement cannot considered to be reliable. In “Experimental Procedure” there is not any information to the calibration for EDX measurements. Please add all this information to Table 2+3. 我后来在表中添加了每个相测量后的标准差。回复如下 Re: The results of the element analysis were obtained with INCA Energy software by Oxford Instruments. The XPP matrix correction scheme of Pouchou and Pichoir provided by the software is used, for its favorable performance when tilted samples consisting light elements in a heavy matrix. The standards referencing used in this EDS system is virtual standard sample library. And, the instrument is corrected every two years with the Oxford SPI standard samples by the professional engineer. To minimize the error, the compositions reported in this paper were the averages of at least five measurement 审稿人还是不满意，回复如下 The sum of mass% which is easily available from INKA is still not given in Table 2. This information is important! The given errors are partly unrealistic, e.g. C4, at% of Al in "MnSn2" is given as 0.5(0.1). This error comes may be from statistics of several measurements but does not include systematic errors. The determination of light elements within a matrix of rather heavy elements has for sure an error of more than 0.5 at.%, which is considered to be the minimum error of conventional SEM/EDX method. 我不太懂他是什么意思，是在表中加入每个相的质量总和吗？可是这总和不都是100%吗？恳求大神帮忙解惑。 1111111111111111111111.png查看更多1个回答 . 15人已关注
第1天
关注盖德视界
添加小助手
